Boldini v. Owens Corning 744 N.E.2d 370
Ann Boldini filed an appeal (Boldini v. Owens Corning 744 N.E.2d 370) in a mesothelioma lawsuit following the death of her husband due to asbestos-related injuries. Mr. Boldini received a mesothelioma diagnosis after several years of workplace asbestos exposure….
The Illinois 4th District Court of Appeals reviewed Boldini’s appeal and published its ruling on February 9,
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 202
Congoleum Corporation filed an appeal (Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 202) in a mesothelioma lawsuit after the courts awarded damages to Kathleen Ehret, following her husband’s death due to workplace asbestos exposure. Mr. Ehret was exposed to flooring products containing asbestos… while working as a floor covering contractor.
The California 2nd District court of Appeals
Franklin v. USX Corp. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 615
USX Corporation filed an appeal (Franklin v. USX Corp. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 615) in a mesothelioma lawsuit after the courts awarded damages to Darrel Franklin following his wife’s death. Mrs. Franklin received a mesothelioma diagnosis after several years of secondhand asbestos exposure… in her childhood home.
Franklin’s appeal was reviewed by the California 1st District Court of Appeals,
Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1425
Joseph Uram filed an appeal (Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1425) after he was denied benefits for his asbestos-related injuries. Uram suffered asbestos exposure while working as a machinist in a naval shipyard….
The ruling of the California 1st District Court of Appeals was published on February 15, 1990. To read the appeals court’s
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 370
Max and Bette Cossman filed an appeal (Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 370) in a mesothelioma lawsuit due to asbestos-related injuries. Mrs. Cossman received a mesothelioma diagnosis after several years of second-hand asbestos exposure… on her husbands work clothes.
The Cossman’s appeal was reviewed by the California 1st District Court of Appeals and its ruling